User
Information
- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Archiving
- Publication Ethics
- Plagiarism Policy
- Publication Frequency
- Author Fees
- Editorial Team
Focus and Scope
Journal of Business and Strategy is a scholarly journal that focuses on business-related research, published biannually in April and October. We welcome manuscripts from business scholars and professionals worldwide concerning all types of business issues. The journal covers a variety of business topics which includes corporate governance, entrepreneurship, organization and human resource management, marketing management, financial management, operation management, strategic management, information system management, and tourism.
We welcome the submission of both conceptual and empirical articles, but empirical articles are preferred to conceptual articles.
The Journal of Business and Strategy (JBS) main aim is to provide readers with latest research/issues related to the study of business. We are committed to advancing the scholarship and practice in business.
Section Policies
Articles
 Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
Artikel yang masuk akan direview. Review artikel dilakukan oleh minimal 2 mitra bebestari secara single blind. Keputusan diterimanya naskah berdasarkan masukan-masukan dari mitra bebestari. Artikel akan diterbitkan setelah melalui rapat akhir dewan redaksi. Pelacakan plagiarisme (screening plagiarism) dilakukan menggunakan Whitesmoke, Plagiarism Checker X 2015 Professional Edition dan Turnitin.
Publication Frequency
October and April
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Archiving
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...
Publication Ethics
JOURNAL PUBLISHER CODE ETHICS
a) Determining the name of the journal, the scope of science, the timeline, and the accreditation.b) Determining the membership of the editorial board.
c) Defining the relationship between publishers, editors, peer review and other parties in the contract.
d) Appreciating the confidentiality of the contributing researchers, author, editor, and peer review.
e) Applying the norms and regulations regarding intellectual property rights especially on the copyrights.
f) Conducting the policy reviews on the journals and present it to the authors, editorial board, peer review, and readers.
g) Making the behavior code guidelines for editor and peer review.
h) Publishing journals on a regular basis.
i) Ensuring the availability of resources for sustainability journal publishing.
j) Establishing cooperation and marketing network.
k) Preparing for the licensing and other legal aspects.
EDITOR CODE ETHICS
a) Improving the quality of publications.
b) Ensuring the process to maintain the quality of published papers.
c) Leading the freedom in delivering opinion.
d) Maintaining the integrity of the author's academic track record.
e) Conveying corrections, clarifications, withdrawal, and an apology if necessary.
f) Owning the responsibility for styling and formatting the paper, while the contents and any statements in the paper are the responsibility of the authors.
g) Assessing policies and attitudes of the published journal from the author and peer review to increase responsibility and minimize errors.
h) Having an open minded personality in accepting the new opinion or views of others who is different than their personal opinion.
i) Prohibiting in defending our own opinion, the author or third parties which may result in a false decision.
j) Encouraging the author, in order to make improvements to the paper until it worth to publish.
PEER REVIEW CODE ETHIC
a) Receiving the task from the editors to review the papers and submit the review to the editor, as a matter of determining the feasibility of the paper for publication.
b) Reviewing the papers in a timely manner (on time) in accordance with the style guide based on scientific principles (method of data collection, the legality of the author, conclusions, etc.).
c) Reviewing the papers that have been corrected in accordance with the standards.
d) Encouraging the author to make improvements in the papers by providing feedback, suggestions, feedback, and recommendations.
e) Maintaining the author privacy by covering the results of the corrections, suggestions, and recommendations received by the author.
f) Reviewers must not review any papers who involve the reviewers in its work, directly or indirectly.
g) Following the guidelines for peer review in reviewing papers and assessing the evaluation form paper given by the editors.
h) Reviewing papers substantively by not correcting the grammar, punctuation and mistype.
i) Ensuring the principles of truth, novelty, and originality; prioritize the benefit of the paper for the development of science, technology, and innovation; also comprehending the impact on the development of science writing.
j) Prohibiting in defending own opinion, the author or third parties which may result on decision reference becoming non-objective.
k) Upholding the value of the objectivity and free from any influences.
l) Ensuring the confidentiality of findings in the paper until it is published.
m) Having broad understanding on the expertise and able to provide a review of the paper appropriately and correctly.
n) Refusing to do review if the research is not from the field of expertise. Instead, the peer review should be giving recommendation to the researcher if there is any other expert on the subjects.
o) Having an open minded personality in accepting the new opinion or views of others who is different than their personal opinion.
p) Refusing to do the review if the deadline given by the editor cannot be reached. If absent the peer review should notify the editor as early as possible.
q) The results of the review must be presented in an honest, objective, and supported by clear arguments. Some possible recommendations from the review are:
1) Accepted without repair
2) Accepted with minor repairs (after repaired by the author, it is not necessary to go to peer review)
3) Accepted with major repairs (after repaired by the author, return to the peer review for re-review)
4) Rejected and recommended for other publication
5) Rejected and recommended not to publish to any publication because scientifically the paper is flawed for the community.
r) Giving rejection for the last recommendation as the last choice related to the feasibility of the papers or with indication of severe violations of the code of ethics related to the author.
s) Reviewed papers aren’t allowed to be used for personal or third party interests. Moreover, The use of some of the contents of the reviewed papers must have received permission from the author.
AUTHOR/ARTICLE WRITER CODE ETHICS
a) Author collectively responsible for the work and the content of the article which cover methods, analysis, calculation, and its details.
b) Author immediately responds to the comments made by the peer review professionally and timely.
c) Author should inform the editor if they retract their paper.
d) The author describes the limitations in the study.
e) Author respects the publishers if they demand to not to publish the findings in the form of interviews or through any other media before the publication.
f) The author informs the editor of (a) paper that is part of a phased research, multidisciplinary, and different perspectives.
g) The author makes a statement that the papers submitted for publication is original, has not been published anywhere in any language, and not in the process of submission to another publisher.
h) If there is any error in the paper, the author should immediately notify the editor or publisher.
i) The use of materials from other publications which is copyrighted, should be given a written permission and gratitude.
j) The author refers to the work of others as appropriate in citations and quotations which used in the paper.
k) When delivering new discoveries or improving inventions the authors should mention the job previous researcher/writer/founder.
l) The author is not allowed to give a bibliography of the publications if they do not read the publication.
m) If requested, the authors prepared the proof that the research has already met the requirements of the research ethics including the field notes.
n) Author adequately responds if there are any comments or feedback after the paper published.
Publication Ethics code referenced by the Journal of Humanities Education based on Buku Peraturan Kepala LIPI is sourced from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Scientific Publication Ethics Code can be downloaded here
Plagiarism Policy
PLAGIARISM INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO:
b. refer and/or quoting random terms, words and/or sentences, data and/or information from a source without citing a source in the record citation and/or without stating the source adequately;
c. using a source of ideas, opinions, views, or theory without stating the source adequately;
d. formulate the words and/or sentences themselves from the source of words and/or phrases, ideas, opinions, views, or theory without stating the source adequately;
e. submit a scientific papers produced and/or published by others as a source of scientific work without express adequately.
PREVENTION
In every article submitted to the Journal of Humanities Education must be attached to a statement signed by the author that:
a. The article is free of plagiarism;
b. if at a later proved there is plagiarism in the article, the author is willing to accept the sanctions in accordance with the legislation.
SANCTIONS
a. reprimand;
b. letter of warning;
c. revocation of the article;
d. cancellation of publication.
Letter of Statement of free Plagiarism can be downloaded at here
Publication Frequency
Publication Information:
Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora (Printed ISSN 2338-8110 and Electronic ISSN 2442-3890).
Short journal title: JPH
JPH is published four times a year in March, June, September, and December (Number 1-4)
Author Fees
The authors are being charged for all articles published in JPH.
Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR/USD).
Authors are not being charged for any submitted articles.
Article Publication: 500.000 (IDR)/100.00 (USD)
Authors are being charged for accepted and qualified articles to be published to cover publication cost.
Editorial Team
Editor in Chief
Tri Wulida Afrianty, Administrative Science Faculty, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Vice Editor in Chief
Edriana Pangestuti, Administrative Science Faculty, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Mukhammad K. Mawardi, Administrative Science Faculty, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Nila Firdausi Nuzula, Administrative Science Faculty, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Editorial Boards Members
- Agung Nugroho, Unika Atmajaya, AIABI
- Andriani K, Universitas Brawijaya
- Arik Prasetya, Universitas Brawijaya
- Eko Ganis Sukoharsono, Universitas Brawijaya
- Jaswadi, Politeknik Negeri Malang, Indonesia
- John Burgess, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- Kusdi Rahardjo, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
- M. Al-Musadieq, Universitas Brawijaya
- Mohammad Iqbal, Universitas Brawijaya
- Novita Sari, Universitas Indonesia
- Pahtcerry-Turraronggong, Kasetsaart University, Thailand
- Siti Athika Zulkifli, University of Trengganu Malaysia, Malaysia
- Suhadak, Universitas Brawijaya
- Thu Huong Nguyen, Victoria University,
- Umar Nimran, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
- Urip Santoso, Parahyangan, AIABI
- Yusri Abdillah, Universitas Brawijaya
- Hamidah NU, Universitas Brawijaya
Editorial Assistant
- Aulia Lukman Aziz, Administrative Science Faculty, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
- Wempi Naviera, Administrative Science Faculty, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
- Yudha Prakarsa, Administrative Science Faculty, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
- Fitri Akhadiah, Administrative Science Faculty, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
